Toolz wrote:corenominal wrote:Any future releases will use the same date identifier. I think it is more useful than using "alpha", "beta" tags, which are kind of meaningless. It was probably a good idea to tag the first couple of Debian based builds as alphas, but now that the build process is sorted, it is not necessary.
Any future pre-releases or any future 'releases'?
I mean is this considered 'release' or 'development'? You know, from the point of view of Distrowatch and write-ups.
It is a release, as in the images have been released and made public. If anyone would like to apply any other labels, that is their choice.
Choice, mmm. So all future images released and made public will have that date identifier? This date identifier shouldn't guide people to thinking it's more or less 'release' or 'development', officially?