Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

anonymous wrote:

So then the difference is between Firefox and Iceweasel.

or maybe Ubuntu and Debian big_smile

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

anonymous wrote:
Bruce wrote:

Firefox: Edit > Preferences > Advanced > Update - and check out the greyed out sections.  With Ubuntu you can't even have Firefox "update itself" That's because Ubuntu and Firefox have an agreement!

It has nothing to do with Ubuntu/Canonical. The Check for Updates is grayed out because you need root privileges to update Firefox.


Oops! cool <<-- incognito!

Don't panic, Bruce, stay calm!
It's the first mistake today, you are allowed three!!

See I didn't know that.  But looking here:

http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Opt … ced_update

... suggests you need root privileges or to be the person who installed Firefox.  So if I delete Firefox and get it from the Mozilla site then I'm OK to update.  Seems silly to me.

Now, since I have you attention a question:  Why do we need root privileges?

Some things just boggle the mind;

  • Install Linux Distro A and tell it to use: /dev/sda5 as /media/5 and it belongs to root

  • Install Linux Distro B and tell it to use: /dev/sda5 as /media/5 and it belongs to "user"

{sigh}

Have a nice day.
Bruce

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

Double posted????

error 3 - PANIC!!!!!!!!!

Last edited by Bruce (2009-11-14 20:50:56)

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

omns wrote:
Bruce wrote:

So let me say this again: Ohms - go for it! Paaaallllleeease!!

Honestly, there is nothing for me to 'Go for'! I'm merely making a suggestion here and sharing my experiences.

Any decisions about crunchbang's future directions rest with corenominal smile

Oops! cool <<-- incognito!

Don't panic, Bruce, stay calm!
It's the second mistake today, you are allowed three!!
Stop reading and go to bed now!

And I though you had a hand in the pot.
Now I'm really going to give your HowTo a going over.  smile

Gonna call it: !#CrunchDebian  roll

Have a nice day.
Bruce

Note: How can to tell someone is new to #!?
They make two mistakes in a row.  smile

Joke: just to lighten things up a bit (and totally off topic):

What does a sperm cell and a lawyer have in common?







They both have a 1:1,000,000 chance of becoming a human being!

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

anonymous wrote:

^ Just to test my theory, I ran Firefox as root and the Check for Updates is no longer disabled:

So did I  smile

Last edited by Bruce (2009-11-14 20:54:52)

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

Iceweasel is firefox, but because of the patches that debian apply to it, mozzila dodn't want it to be branded firefox (and debian cant use the original icon 'couse it's not free). Ubuntu and others patch FF too, but ok it with mozilla to be able to use the name & icon (otherwise you need to use the unbranded verison).

a.

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

alon_h wrote:

Iceweasel is firefox, but because of the patches that debian apply to it, mozzila dodn't want it to be branded firefox (and debian cant use the original icon 'couse it's not free). Ubuntu and others patch FF too, but ok it with mozilla to be able to use the name & icon (otherwise you need to use the unbranded verison).

a.


Actually, it's not Mozilla disagreeing about the patches, it's the Debian Free factor kicking in. As you said, logo ain't free, so Debian don't regard it as something they want to distribute, in line with their policy.

Ex-KDE user.
Collects old PC's (Coz he can't afford new ones =P)
Crunchbang @ Distrowatch
My Blog (updated infrequently, and on the #! Planet too.)

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

Going way OT big_smile , it was both: http://lwn.net/Articles/118268/ basically debian wanted it to be called firefox, but without the logo, but mozilla didn't want others to be able to take it and modify it further and still call it FF, but debian has a clause that says they can't get something that's free just to them, and on and on...

EDIT: this http://lwn.net/Articles/200857/ is actually the one I was looking for, follow the links for an all-nighter of FOSS talk. big_smile
a.

Last edited by alon_h (2009-11-14 22:38:25)

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

Blimey, I guess I should think about contributing to this thread. hmm For what it is worth, and for anyone who is not aware, I have been using Debian testing for a few weeks now. I am still trying to get my head around what it would mean if CrunchBang were to be ported over to Debian, and whether or not it is actually a good idea to do so. Sorry for the delay with regards to any solid statements, but I think this is something that needs some serious consideration.

Meanwhile, for anyone interested, I would highly recommend keeping an eye on http://omnsproject.org/ wink

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

corenominal wrote:

and for anyone who is not aware, I have been using Debian testing for a few weeks now.

With Openbox or XFCE ?
wink


And about Iceweasel and Firefox on Debian : I understand that by default it is Iseaweasel who is installed ... But can I install Firefox on Debian ?
Or my question could by make in other way : did the "mozilla Firefox add-ons" play on Iceweasel ???

Last edited by Kookaburra (2009-11-15 08:00:19)

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

corenominal wrote:

I am still trying to get my head around what it would mean if CrunchBang were to be ported over to Debian, and whether or not it is actually a good idea to do so.

I wonder (IMHO) if it would spread out releases of #!, since you wouldnt be "tied" to the ubuntu schedule by our constant nagging and pleading. I dont know if its good or bad - one side means that it comes out when its good and ready and isnt rushed in any way (even though its not rushed now, I have to speculate that you feel some pressure from us nagging you for the next version), but on the other hand, would freedom from a release cycle cause #! to stagnate, as mr. phillip is a much loved, and therefore needed, person by many in the meatworld? Just some thoughts.

Could I also bug someone (ohms) to do a remastersys of their debian-#!-thing, as the debian live CD does not play well with my DNS, and the full .iso doesnt play well with my Dell Mini? Please kind sirs?

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

Kookaburra wrote:

And about Iceweasel and Firefox on Debian : I understand that by default it is Iseaweasel who is installed ... But can I install Firefox on Debian ?
Or my question could by make in other way : did the "mozilla Firefox add-ons" play on Iceweasel ???

a] Yes, but you shouldn't have to because:
b] Yes, because iceweasel IS firefox without the name, + some debian patches that you get with (most) other packages as well, without even knowing.

a.

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

It's a great idea and I will like it if Dr. Phil chooses it.  9.10 is also fine.

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

p0rksh3d wrote:

It's a great idea and I will like it if Dr. Phil chooses it.  9.10 is also fine.

OK, being the new kid on the block, I'll bite:

Who's Dr. Phil?

Have a nice day.
Bruce

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

This is the Dr. Phil I know:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr_Phil

But I think p0rksh3d was trying to refer to Philip.

Note: ** Please read before posting **

BTW if you wish to contact me, send me an e-mail instead of a PM.

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

anonymous wrote:

This is the Dr. Phil I know:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr_Phil

But I think p0rksh3d was trying to refer to Philip.

OFF Topic
Wait a sec, Dr. Phil. former psychologist, TV --- sounds like... naaaa it couldn't be ...

You sure you don't mean Dr. Fraser and a radio show?

"No users were found matching your criteria"
End of this Off Topic topic.  smile

We now resume with the On Topic topic:
Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

Have a nice day.
Bruce

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

I didn't even know Dr. Phil used Linux! ;-p

Freedom to choose is the most basic of all rights.

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

Having built up a Crunchbang like Debian testing based system using tips from both omnsproject.org and http://crunchbanglinux.org/forums/post/43062/#p43062 (thanks Raffles10) and I'm more than content with the setup. I find the performance on my Compaq Evo N600c PIII/256mb a little better than Crunchbang 9.04. I'm content enough to leave it installed.

My Acer Aspire 6530 is currently a mutant Crunchbang/Ubuntu 9.10 build but would absolutely welcome Debian as a new base. Yes it is a bit more work on the front end, however I think the bulk of this (installing the extra apps after a net install of testing) could be handled by a script, though I may be thinking to simply.

Last edited by jinnstar (2009-11-15 22:57:18)

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

my question would be: would i (being a relative linux noob and been using #! 9.04.1 for a few weeks now and who hasn't used debian before) notice the difference if #! was debian or ubuntu?

It's hard to find something if you don't know what you're looking for.
I have a blog, it's mostly about conky and lua stuff... go here.

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

mrpeachy wrote:

my question would be: would i (being a relative linux noob and been using #! 9.04.1 for a few weeks now and who hasn't used debian before) notice the difference if #! was debian or ubuntu?

If #! stays with, OpenBox, I doubt you would notice anything.  For example I came from Xubuntu to #!.  Both built on Ubuntu, both use the same repos.. Adding OpenBox to Xubu would not have been the same, I would have missed the special configuration that has been done on OpenBox (and other things I'm probably unaware of) in #!.  But all my config files from Firefox, Thunderbird, Claws-mail, gFTP to name a few are here with me.

So from an absolutely "new to Linux" point of view, would you notice the difference. I doubt it, not if they keep everything that is #! in the new version. You would use Synaptic to get a program as now, they would be DEB packages as they are now.  Iceweasel is FF, and Icemail Thunderbird.

Notice the word: doubt. There is a small chance that you would notice something, and that might lead to a 5 minute learning curve.

Buy an old car, change the engine.  It's still the same car, you can still drive it, but the engine is new. The learning curve kicks in when you want to play with that extra 200 horse power your new engine has.  Control on curves, acceleration, manoeuvring, etc.  Driving a normal family version of a Chevy or Ford requires the same skills, even though the two cars are different.

Go to a non-debian based Linux and now you have a learning curve. (from slight to heavy)
Portage or pacman instead of synaptic. But it's a name, learn how to use it and it gets a file and installs it like synaptic.

There is always the terminal too:

sudo apt-get install "program program2 program3 -y"
or
sudo aptitude install "program program2 program3 -y"

Or this one I use, "autoinstall.sh" a space between the program names and a -y at the end so I don't have to answer "Yes" for each file.  I use that after a fresh install.  I also have to modify it as it was built with Xfce in mind to get programs that didn't come with the install.  Some of those are installed with #!.  smile

#!/bin/bash

sudo aptitude install smartmontools gthumb gedit gedit-plugins vnstat curl conky lm-sensors hddtemp ntp ntp-doc homebank aspell-en aspell-es ispell escputil weblint-perl libxml2-utils gimp-help-en flashplugin-nonfree libdate-manip-perl claws-mail claws-mail-doc claws-mail-extra-plugins hunspell myspell-tools myspell-es myspell-en-gb wcanadian-huge jpilot jpilot-backup jppy jppy-jpilot-plugins nvclock whois traceroute recordmydesktop openoffice.org openoffice.org-help-en-gb openoffice.org-help-es openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-us screenruler -y

it's in my path so in a terminal I type autoinstall and I get them all.

So nutshell answer: No! - My opinion.

Sorry for the long winded response, that's just me at times.  big_smile

Have a nice day.
Bruce

Last edited by Bruce (2009-11-17 11:42:32)

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

Well, because I want to have my own experience about debian, I have install "sidux momos" (a distro derivated of Debian SID) with Openbox. I know it could be a dangerous choise (Sid = unstable), but Sidux seems to be very stable in fact (with some additions which allow to keep a Stable Sid tongue).

I more difficult (than with #!) to make "perfect" installation (wifi, drivers NVIDIA, JAVA, FLASH, and some others little problems lol For example,  Ihave difficulty with "CpuFreq"), but it's very interesting, and I think I could more understand Linux in this way !!! big_smile
During the configuration, I'm going to "copy" #! in a lot of thinks : dmenu, gmrun, conky, ... It's not so hard to have a Debian Sid looking like #!,it's very cool ! smile

The system seems to be more effecient, but it could be just an impression ... Wait and see wink

http://nsa10.casimages.com/img/2009/11/17/mini_091117045643550874.png

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

Bruce wrote:

So nutshell answer: No! - My opinion.

I'm glad to hear that (I suspected it might be so).  I would hate to start up my shiny new $! installation and start crying! big_smile

Going from Jaunty to Karmic there were small changes but I had at least some idea about the basics.
I intend to use the next release of #! whatever it might be and whenever it might be released.

It's hard to find something if you don't know what you're looking for.
I have a blog, it's mostly about conky and lua stuff... go here.

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

Just wanted to say that #! introduced me to the power of Openbox and I shall be eternally grateful.

Given that I exclusively use a 9-year-old Toshiba Portege (including heavy use of LaTeX), I am looking for stability and low memory usage.  I found one or two small problems which, I think are more to do with the Ubuntu base than #!.  In particular I found Openoffice from the Ubuntu reps (I mainly use Draw) to be a little unstable, crashing at least once a day.

Nevertheless, I did a command line install of Debian Testing followed by

aptitude install iceweasel gdm wicd gedit pcmanfm obconf obmenu gnome-power-manager fbpanel xorg openbox firmware-ralink wireless-tools flashplugin-nonfree flashplugin-nonfree openoffice.org evince texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended gtk-theme-switch gtk2-engines gimp galculator openoffice.org-help-en-gb openoffice.org-gtk ttf-liberation ttf-mscorefonts-installer cups-pdf system-config-printer evolution gthumb gnome-terminal

And that was it.

Without being scientific, I feel that the memory usage has reduced a bit (this machine has 390 MB) and stability is rock-solid -- maybe two Firefox (renamed Iceweasel) crashes in a month the only problems with not one OOo crash at all.

Of course, there is much more involved to produce a #! based upon Debian that just works for all hardware.

Anyway, my main point is to thank you all for your forum and the help that it provides for learning about all things Openbox and its configuration.

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

Looking at the screenshot threads for the last couple of months it's really interesting how many of us have taken the plunge and are now using Debian Squeeze as a base for our machines. The range of crunchbang like efforts has been amazing. I'd now more than ever love to see a Crunchbang based on the final Squeeze release which should be a  cracker!

It will still be a bit longer to wait but it would make for a wonderful stable release smile big_smile cool

50

Re: Debian Testing as base for next Crunchbang release (Suggestion)

My only problem with this is that Ubuntu 10.04 has done a nice job in decreasing boot time, and it's only at alpha 3.  To my knowledge, no Debian version will have done that, and given the speed at which Debian changes, it could take a long time before we see it.  For me on my netbook, boot time is paramount.  Is there some way to incorporate Ubuntu 10.04 boot tricks into a squeeze or sidbang?

Last edited by fox (2010-02-27 23:03:19)

Mac user with Linux tendencies
#!CrunchBang Statler & UNE 10.10 on Acer 1810TZ (OCZ Vertex 60gb SSD)
#!, Mint LMDE & Peppermint Ice on MSI Wind U100 (Gigabye Atheros b/g wireless)
Various linux virtual machines on a Mac mini, an iMac and a MacBook Pro