Topic: Advantages of using Debian as the base instead of Ubuntu?
Just wondering. Technical and user advantages are good.
CrunchBang Linux Forums » CrunchBang Talk » Advantages of using Debian as the base instead of Ubuntu?
Just wondering. Technical and user advantages are good.
Basically it was a personal decision by CrunchBang's sole developer, so I won't put words into his mouth. ![]()
http://reddevil62-techhead.blogspot.com
lains.html
http://crunchbanglinux.org/forums/topic
explained/
Yeah, I saw that thread after I posted this. Of course. ![]()
So it's strictly just a personal decision?
So it's strictly just a personal decision?
A few of us may have whispered in his ear. ![]()
Hehe. ![]()
I'm not saying anything bad. I love Debian. I was just wondering.
Well one advantages is being able to use a rolling release system (testing or unstable). Statler currently uses "squeeze" but you can easily change it.
Personally, I won't say anything bad about Ubuntu (it was my first distro), but I find their fresh-reinstall-every-6-month release cycle to be a time-waster. I am actually still using CrunchBang 9.04 on 2 computers. It works fine for my purposes, but support will be ending in October, and I'll be forced to move on.
The switch to Debian means more stability and double the support period (roughly 3 years) which I think makes #! a more appealing choice for a work/productivity computer.
I have noticed alot of distros have made the move from Ubuntu to Debian as a base lately. I think the majority of it has to do with Linux and FOSS politics. Meaning people are just unhappy with the direction they see Ubuntu moving towards. As for Crunchbang, I think Debian was a better fit for development, as well as the user base. you probably won't find very many people complaining that #! is no longer based on Ubuntu ![]()
I think the move was for the best, and really would like if #! evolved into something like Mepis - taking advantage of the incredible stability of debian (stable release) and putting additional newer software and "corenominal's touch". As it would be just great. ![]()
There was an article with some answers explaining the switch. I completely agree with the change to debian base. I have found ubuntu to be growing further away from the reasons why I originally chose it. Being on ubuntu since edgy, 10.04 was the worst release ever to me. I really like crunch based on 9.04 ( just converted after I got fed up with 10.04 ) and probably would not have used statler if it was based on 10.04.
There are some negatives, mainly being that things like my Ralink card need to have drivers compiled and added as modules rather than just working out of the box, but Debian does make changing the kernel pretty easy so I can't complain.
The biggest advantage really though is that there are fewer dependencies pulled in by default. This really helps for those that have slow Internet connections or that don't feel like cluttering their computer up with needless software.
For whatever reason my computer uses significantly less ram when running the same system as a debian base, rather than an ubuntu one, but it is impossible to compare directly easily as the same application will pull in other packages on Ubuntu versus Debian.
The biggest advantage really though is that there are fewer dependencies pulled in by default.
This times eleventy. Also, Ubuntu seems to have some very strange ideas about what constitutes a "dependency". I can't cite any specifics at the moment, but there have been lots of times when I've had:
$ sudo aptitude remove $trivial_package_I_dont_want
The following packages will be REMOVED:
{pretty much the entire system}Val_B wrote:The biggest advantage really though is that there are fewer dependencies pulled in by default.
This times eleventy. Also, Ubuntu seems to have some very strange ideas about what constitutes a "dependency". I can't cite any specifics at the moment, but there have been lots of times when I've had:
$ sudo aptitude remove $trivial_package_I_dont_want The following packages will be REMOVED: {pretty much the entire system}
yeah, i had that once when i removed vim or something, the trick is to use aptitude and mark everything as user installed, the man page should tell you how to do it.
Another thing to remember about Ubuntu is that many of the "packages" that get removed are just meta-packages. If the trivial package is a "recommend" of several metas, those are no longer considered to be installed. (I freaked out too the first time I saw that removing some-trivial-package would remove gnome-desktop & a ton of other metas.)
Posts [ 14 ]
CrunchBang Linux Forums » CrunchBang Talk » Advantages of using Debian as the base instead of Ubuntu?
Forums powered by PunBB. Hosted by Linode.
Copyright © CrunchBang Linux.
Proudly powered by Debian GNU/Linux.
Debian is a registered trademark of Software in the Public Interest, Inc.